Full July CFC killboard analysis

I pay for the monthly CFC losses, like the July one. This month, mistakes were made and the CFC kill data was also downloaded. It's a huge database because of the duplications between CFC alliances (same kill appears at every alliance that had pilot in the fleet), so I wouldn't pay for it. But as it was downloaded by accident, I got it for free and didn't let it go waste. At first, I've updated the coalition lists using the Marlona Sky map and the Dingo Coalition data. The changes are small, the only worth mentioning is the EICO - Gentleman's.Club change.

First, let's see the kills and losses from the CFC perspective. The data is - as always - dewhored, so if someone made 1% damage of a 100M ship, he got 1M kill booked instead of 100M. All kills and losses are billion ISK: The two renter corps did horrible, but I doubt if anyone is surprised. The fact that most CFC alliances also did bad is more surprising, especially for RAZOR who are soooooo confident in their eliteness, despite being just as bad as SMA. Goonwaffe has 2682 members, while the inner pets have 8835. So an average GoonWaffe Goon had 60M kills in July while an average Inner Pet had 56M. Now I'm surprised, expecting much less from the Masters. Maybe they are reforming after all, kicking large group of slackers in April. Please note that participating in fun PvP isn't equal to participating in bombless bomber fleets, which is mandatory to minions but not to Goonwaffe members. So the GRR war goes on!

Now let's look at the enemy coalitions with their Apex Forces and 35000 friends and half the universe under their control and whatever the propagandists use to say. Please note that only their de-whored kills against CFC and losses from CFC are listed, as only this can be seen from the CFC kill and loss data. They are sorted by their activity (kills+losses): Whoa! Some old, elite PvP alliances like SOUND, XPLCT and TEST shine out, but most of the coalition members could barely break even against CFC or not even that. I'm not talking about the renters who were farmed, but Nulli and DARKNESS being worse than BRAVE. If you look at the color of this chart, you can easily tell that these guys will never beat CFC, because their ethos and self-image is a big lie: they see themselves as "elite PvP" and they are just average.

Now, this is the color I want to see. This table shows non-coalition alliances and non-alliance corps (except NPC corps). They were sorted by total activity (kills+losses), so I didn't cherry-pick. On the top of the chart, with 97%!!! ISK efficiency stands The Marmite Collective, the highsec wardeccer I pay to kill CFC. Yes, I'm smug about the out-of-the-box idea to attack a nullsec Sov-holder in highsec. Black Legion was very active, but wasn't very good, unlike Pasta, MoA and Mortus. I doubt if you need more proof that the hope of defeating the Evil in New Eden lies in roaming pirates and not in supercap blobs.

So, enemy coalitions fail to defeat CFC in non-sov warfare, while pirate groups definitely can do it:
Finally, the famous fleet size distribution: every bar represents about 10% of the July CFC PvP activity (kills+losses). You can see that CFC is worst in small-gang PvP and excels in the largest brackets. So if you want to defeat them, form with 2-20 and if they come with larger group, or escalate a fight, just run away and deny them kills. If you stand and fight against a CFC blob, you lose:

PS: carrier ratting went seriously wrong.