tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1461700565722278823.post6775241121431919731..comments2024-02-27T14:44:07.868+01:00Comments on Greedy goblin: The economy of the suicide ganksGevlonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07072766785893313616noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1461700565722278823.post-39259546957086892942013-01-08T14:28:39.227+01:002013-01-08T14:28:39.227+01:00Recovered modules already added.
I never said the...Recovered modules already added.<br /><br />I never said the bar should be risen to "T2 Vexor + Orca alt for quick rebasing". A T1 Catalyst is 300DPS higher than nothing. I'm saying that if you can fit higher, do!Gevlonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07072766785893313616noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1461700565722278823.post-80627150490775525002013-01-08T13:41:50.769+01:002013-01-08T13:41:50.769+01:00One aspect that James 315's article mentions a...One aspect that James 315's article mentions and you do not is training time. New Order gankers are expected to be alts, and the purpose of catalysts is to provide maximum DPS per training hour. The number of people willing to spend a few days training a spare character to fly a catalyst but not willing to spend weeks training for a T2 fit vexor MUST be non-zero, so I think the current New Order approach is the correct one. Keep the bar for entry low, then wait and see how many people are willing to train for fits which are more expensive, in terms of ISK and also time.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1461700565722278823.post-67307179647940916092013-01-08T13:38:33.298+01:002013-01-08T13:38:33.298+01:00Don't gankers typically try to recover fitting...Don't gankers typically try to recover fittings and shouldn't the likely recover rate be added to the maths?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1461700565722278823.post-35225534247745170942013-01-08T10:04:06.024+01:002013-01-08T10:04:06.024+01:00Interesting analysis however I believe your approa...Interesting analysis however I believe your approach to compare everything to isk/hour is not correct. It's only valid if another person is like clockwork doing another activity earning isk during free waiting minutes, but you need to account "human factor", including transition period to another activity, minimum time/attention required to start and complete the task, not to mention if another person would even choose to do another isk related activity.<br /><br />Also analysis is only valid mostly if you use same account to earn isk or can't multitask another activity that you do for isk.<br /><br />Now to be more accurate I would evaluate this as a kills/hour/cost assuming there are infinite targets reachable. This is basically same thing, but from different perspective not having isk/hour as an indicator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1461700565722278823.post-25714124136259038192013-01-08T08:47:19.961+01:002013-01-08T08:47:19.961+01:00Then just the euro zone has to step up, but even t...Then just the euro zone has to step up, but even then the T2 cata beats the lesser ones in economic effectivityGevlonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07072766785893313616noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1461700565722278823.post-33046363955570591762013-01-08T08:31:44.766+01:002013-01-08T08:31:44.766+01:00The idea that each personn after two participants ...The idea that each personn after two participants adds 5 minutes is plainly wrong. Each time i have suicide gank with James&Co it was extremely welll organized... We probbaly ganked targets every 17-19 minutes or so and we were at least 5-6 no counting the scout.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com